Roy has given me a place to think about tango in a different way.
Here are some of my thoughts on Tango as a dance, a form of expression, a philosophy, if you will. Some is old material.
Roy
P.S. It is a bit kitsch.
On the Spiritual
Physicality of The Tango
by Roy Whitman
The Tango begins with
the embrace between consciousness and necessity, or the spiritual and physical
worlds, which assumes a restricted form (Adorno & Horkheimer). The embrace represents one physical unit,
like an anchor, with its own weight and synergy. The steps of the tango, however, are light
and ephemeral. It is both Beethoven and
Bach at once, or the physical and spiritual entwined (Kundera). The dance is both spiritual (heavy) and
spirited (light) with two physical beings together like Jacob wrestling with
the Angel (Genesis). It is both a
restricted physicality (Cohen) and a restricted spirituality (Whitman). It is the forces of nature colliding with the
forces of heaven (Wagner). It is the
very breath of God (Michelangelo).
The Tango is neither a
purely physical phenomenon nor purely a spiritual phenomenon. The physical attributes of it can influence
the spiritual attributes and the spiritual attributes can influence the
physical attributes (Osborne, “Marx and Freud,” Elster “Making Sense of Marx,”
and Engels on Marx) and each can interplay with the other in a myriad of
nuanced and subtle ways. The Tango is
pure physics; to every action there is an equal and opposite reaction (Newton), combined with
improvisation inspired by the primitive Id (Freud). Think of “Summer breeze makes me feel fine/tangoing
with the jasmine in my mind” (Seals & Crofts); “Dust in the wind/all we are,
are tango partners in the wind” (Kansas);
and “The answer, my friend, is tangoing in the wind/the answer is tangoing in
the wind.” (Dylan, Peter, Paul & Mary)
Tango is a most
utilitarian form of dance, satisfying both the higher and lower pleasures, or
the spirit and the body. (Stuart Mills) It
is both a Gemeinschaft, or community, and a Gesellschaft, or society. (Marx) While the former is based on a relatively
homogenous culture and tends to be intimate, informal, cooperative, and imbued
with a sense of moral obligation to the group, the latter is more formal,
goal-oriented, heterogeneous, and based on individual self-interest,
competition, and complex division of labor. It is Japanese discipline,
teamwork, and craftsmanship, (Toyota)
combined with a pursuit of egotistical advantages. (Smith)) As such, it is subject
to relativity or the influence of space and time. (Einstein)
Tango is art and the
culture of love. Colorful and dream-like (Chagall) yet abstract, angular, and
obtuse while being sensual and hypnotic (Modern and Impressionism), Tango
captures the essence between two people or forces. It is Eros and Thanatos
vying for predominance or the Ego reconciling with the Id. (Freud).
It is Romeo and Juliet, Samson and Delilah, Marc Antony and Cleopatra,
Tristan and Isolde, Maria and Tony, the King and I, and Captain Von Trapp and
Maria. Our daddies always said :”It
takes two to tango.”.
Roy has given me a place to think about tango in a different way.
Here are some of my thoughts on Tango as a dance, a form of expression, a philosophy, if you will. Some is old material.
Here are some of my thoughts on Tango as a dance, a form of expression, a philosophy, if you will. Some is old material.
Roy
P.S. It is a bit kitsch.
On the Spiritual
Physicality of The Tango by Roy Whitman
No comments:
Post a Comment